Contact Safe GHK-Cu

Reach the editors

Safe GHK-Cu is an independent editorial project summarizing the peer-reviewed GHK-Cu literature. Use the form below for corrections, citation questions, or to flag a figure you think we have circled wrong or a source we should have struck through. Because the whole method here is checking claims against their sources, a well-documented correction is the most useful message we can receive.

We do not provide medical advice, we do not sell or ship any product, and we cannot answer questions about purchasing, dosing, or personal use. Those are outside what an editorial digest does. For anything health-related, the appropriate destination is a qualified healthcare professional.

What we can and can't help with

We can help with: pointing you to the primary source behind a specific figure, clarifying which form (free GHK versus the copper chelate, or an analog like AHK-Cu) a cited study used, and correcting errors in our summaries ^[14]. We cannot help with: medical guidance, dosing, sourcing, pricing, or any transaction. There is no clinic, pharmacy, or sales desk behind this site — only the editorial reading of the literature.

If you are writing to dispute a number, the most useful note names the page, quotes the line, and links the study you think we have misread. That is how the wall stays honest: a circled figure is only as good as the source taped beside it, and we would rather correct a struck-through claim than defend one. If something here was simply unclear, that is worth flagging too — a confusing summary is a kind of error, and clarity is part of a safety reading.

This is a reading project, not a service. We answer questions about the literature and the sources; we do not answer questions about whether, how, or where to use GHK-Cu. For those, a qualified healthcare professional is the right place to start.